Della Quinlan

Rubicon is looking for a few (3) excellent leaders

We’ve got 3 interesting roles to add to our Rubicon (actually our current company is called Rubicon, and we’re creating a new company we affectionately called Rubicon TNG until we name it more formally). We’re ready to hire some leaders who want to co-own and co-build a business that enables transformative outcomes. We wanted to ask you, our community to help us get the word out on it.


The future of publishing: Why ebooks failed in 2000, and what it means for 2010

This post is adapted from a speech I gave at the O’Reilly Tools of Change publishing industry conference in February. It’s a great time for ebooks. There are at least six ebook reader devices on the market or in preparation….


Wall Street Journal: When Does Technology Cross Ethics?

Can the use of new technology be unethical? Or does such use never cross the ‘bright line’ of ethics?

A piece in the Wall Street Journal raises those questions:

“Police in Washington D.C. arrested a man they believe is responsible for a string of assaults, the Washington Post reported this week. The breakthrough in the case came when investigators placed a tracking device on the car of a convicted rapist. There wasn’t much evidence linking the man to the assaults beyond his past and the fact that he lived in the area. But thanks to the GPS device, the police caught the man committing an assault.

Here’s the catch: The police didn’t have court approval to place the device. And, according to the Post, this is an increasingly common tactic.”

Read the entire story here.

Categories: Values and All things Good

Tags: , , , , ,

| Post a comment | Post a trackback
post this entry to del.icio.us del.icio.us | digg this story! digg | post this story to newsvine newsvine | bookmark this entry google


0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Wall Street Journal: When Does Technology Cross Ethics?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://rubiconconsulting.com/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/761


Leave a comment:


Verification (needed to reduce spam):